| |
Our weekly updates seem to be something that you, our members have wanted. We have received many positive responses from this communication effort. Thank you for all your comments. This is something that we will definitely continue. If there is a topic you would like us to focus on, please let us know and we will be sure to provide more information.
Dear AmphiEA Members,
The process of selecting a new superintendent for Amphi is officially under way! The first step involves getting community input on the education, experience, qualities and characteristics we would like to see in our future superintendent. This phase always reminds me of the scene in Mary Poppins when Jane and Michael are writing their description of the perfect nanny: “has a cheery disposition, rosy cheeks, no warts, plays games – all sorts…” Any time one of these lists is created, it ends up describing someone who can’t possibly exist. It might as well include the characteristic ‘walks on water’.
What is more useful to me is to start with the non-example. What don’t we want
to see in our new leadership? Having been in the district for 21 years and having
served under 3 different superintendents, I have seen a wide range of possibilities.
At its lowest point, our district had a superintendent who:
If you were unable to attend the forum and would still like to provide input to the consultant conducting the search, you can by completing the survey at this link: survey . While the questions on the survey do address some important issues, it is painfully weak on administration/employee relationships and doesn’t address working with the Association at all. Please take the time to complete this survey and take advantage of the “other” boxes to add considerations you think are important but missing from the survey. Your input will help to guide both the search consultant and the Governing Board in the selection of possible candidates and the person who is eventually hired. This may be your best chance to influence the final decision. Please take advantage of it.
John
| |